CPR uses legal strategies, advocacy, and policy to promote the integration and full community participation of people with disabilities and all others who are devalued in today’s society.
-
Litigation
Expanding and protecting the rights of people with disabilities.
-
Defend Section 504
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 is under attack. Learn more and stay up-to-date on advocacy efforts to save it.
-
Advocacy
Stay current on disability issues, educate yourself about the impact of proposed policy changes, and learn how to take action.
-
Supported Decision-Making
Learn about SDM, read how SDM transforms lives, and become a participant, supporter or advocate.
-
COVID-19
Get up-to-date resources on COVID-19 and its impact on people with disabilities, including information on the latest policy developments, medical rationing, and Medicaid.
News
-
June 25, 2025
Despite ongoing federal threats to the rights of people with disabilities, CPR has achieved impressive outcomes and dramatic progress in both our litigation and advocacy efforts.
-
June 23, 2025
Texas Public Radio airs feature following the landmark disability decision in Steward v. Young. CPR special counsel, Steven Schwartz, remarked on the decision, "It is clear that this court cares about people who told their stories, elevated their sometimes-tragic situations, and was really compassionate in understanding what sort of terrible lives people were forced into, unwittingly, unknowingly and really against their will."
-
June 20, 2025
Texas Tribune article following a favorable decision in Steward v. Young, on behalf on Texans with IDD living in nursing facilities
-
June 19, 2025
A Texas federal judge has just ruled that State officials are violating federal law, causing irreparable harm to thousands of Texans with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) whom they segregate in nursing facilities without mandated services or opportunities for community living.
-
May 20, 2025
The plaintiffs in Jonathan R. sought systemic relief for constitutional violations in West Virginia’s child welfare system while also raising claims on behalf of a subclass of youth with disabilities.